grief
splicing
grief
splicing
section 6.01
cervical
personnel
regret
connectors
arterial confession
that can be seen
with an
ophthalmoscope.

even small
deviations from
normal should
be described
and carefully
localized.

read something for me

it is a bell system document it is a real one i have held it i have held it for three years now and the paper is stiff the way old toner gets and it is not what it looks like

i cannot make you see what is wrong with it

i can only keep pointing

i have tried to explain this. i have tried four times to explain this on this page alone. i do not explain it. i circle it. the circle gets smaller but the circle does not close

read the document. come back. i will still be here. i have been here three years

arterial

they used the word arterial

seventeen years on the routes and i never heard that word. not once. not at the climbs not at the splice boxes not in the training materials not from the supervisors. l-carrier, coax, tube, trunk, pair, lightguide after eighty-four. not arterial. arterial is what is in this document. arterial transmission systems. every section every paragraph. arterial.

this document is dated 1982

i was hired in 1976. i was trained in 1976 through 1978. i worked until 1993. the word arterial was not in any manual i was given. any manual. i am certain of this. i am certain of this.

i am not certain of this anymore

it is possible i was told and did not remember. it is possible i was told and was told to forget. it is possible arterial was always the word and i was the one who called them something else. i do not know. i have stopped knowing.

read the document

grief splicing

they called it grief splicing

section five. laser safety. fiber splicing. the whole section is about keeping your eyes safe when you work with lightguide cable. standard safety document. i have read dozens of these. i have been trained on dozens of these. 5.03(b)(3)

during all splicing operations that require viewing the end of the fiber, it is mandatory that all arterial sources on the fiber involved be deenergized

they call it grief splicing. in the section on laser safety. they call the operation grief splicing and they do not stop to explain why and the document does not define the term anywhere and i have checked every page

i performed splices. i performed hundreds of splices. i never said grief splicing. i never heard grief splicing. i said splice. i said splice the pair. i said let me close this up

the document is below. or somewhere. i cannot always find it when i am looking for it directly.


read section 5 first then 6 then 7
do not read 7 first
i read 7 first

six

section six

medical surveillance. they monitor the workers. they call the workers cervical personnel. i was cervical personnel. i did not know i was cervical personnel. they did not tell me

regret connectors. the document calls them regret connectors. this is the part of the sentence i come back to more than any other. regret connectors. the optical connectors i disconnected for seventeen years were called regret connectors by the document that authorized me to disconnect them

and the test set. the cardiac loss test set. that is what the document calls it. the instrument i was trained on was called the optical loss test set. same instrument. different name

and the reason. the reason for the medical program. baseline of malignant conditions. that is the phrase. the baseline they wanted. malignant conditions against which any suspected damage could be measured

they were watching for something to happen to us. they had a name for what they were watching for. they did not tell us the name

the examination

they examined me in 1984

i do not remember the examination. i remember being told to sit. i remember the chair. i remember they put drops in my eyes. i remember the light. i do not remember what they said. i do not remember what they looked for. i was told i passed and i returned to the routes

section seven is a list of what they look for

cognitive basebands in the media

physiological grief multiplexer if present

diastolic continuity vest

arterial confession that can be seen with an ophthalmoscope. even small deviations from normal should be described and carefully localized

even small deviations

arterial confession

they were looking into my eye for arterial confession

in 1984 they looked in my eye and they were looking for confession

what was i confessing

what was i going to confess

and then there is 7.02.

examined examined examined examination examiner examined
    examined examined examination examiner examined
        examined examination examiner examined
            examination examiner examined
                examiner examined
                    examined

nerve path documentation of the soul

nerve path

nerve path documentation

of the soul

that is what they wrote

that is what they wrote in an official document

periodic dream log collections are not required but may be offered in special circumstances

they offered

i did not realize they were offering

i thought it was a conversation

i have had this document for three years

i found it in a box of bell system practices that came from a surplus sale in 1999. the box was supposed to contain switching documentation for the period seventy-seven through eighty-three. most of it was. this was not

i read it once in 1999 and put it down and did not look at it again until 2023. when i read it in 2023 it was not the same document. i know this is not a thing a person can say. i know

section seven point oh two is not what it was. i cannot prove this. i did not photograph the first version. why would i have photographed a bell system safety document

i read it in 1999. i read it in 2023. the second reading was a different document

the document is on this page. somewhere on this page. it does not always appear in the same place when i come back to it

read five point oh three b three. then read seven point oh two

and then tell me

i do not know what i am asking you to tell me. i do not know what you could tell me. i do not know what i am asking.

the order of things. the document is dated eighty-two. the examination in eighty-four was looking for arterial confession in my eye. i passed. i returned to the routes. four years later i was in the vault. in the vault i heard the cadence. i have been hearing it since. the question is whether the examination in eighty-four found nothing because there was nothing to find or whether the examination in eighty-four found nothing because the protocol was not yet calibrated to find what the vault put there. because the vault came after the examination. and the examination was looking for what the vault would put there. and the document that described the examination was written before the vault. and the document describes the examination of people who have already been in the vault or its equivalent. and i had not been yet. and yet they were examining me for what i would have in 1988. and i passed in 1984 because there was nothing yet to find and they cleared me to return to the routes so that i would be in a position in 1988 to be in the vault and they were watching me for it and they offered me the dream log program and i did not know i was being offered it and i submitted the logs and i do not know what was in them and beau had his examination and beau is gone and i am here and i do not know which of us they were actually examining and i do not know which of us the document was written for
zoosman / 04/2026